![]() Doing so places a giant bullseye on your Cruisers(which is what you want) while dishing tons of damage against small ships at the onset of battle. Exception being the Heavy Weapon mount on the Coordinator/Cruiser where Id recommend Blast Area Effect Battery. It doesnt mean you cant go full Kinetic though since UE is the lone faction that can truly dominate with Kinetic Weapons(See #7 and #8)ģ) Protector/Coordinator ships equipped with Kintetic Slugs and packed to the brim with Defense/Support Modules. Unfortunate but is sadly the case(see #4 as to why). Doing so yields the maximum amount of module slots while also increasing Base Manpower by 50%.Ģ) Energy beats Kinetic in virtually every respect. in the late nineteenth century that led to the modernizing of their fleets and doctrines.Im no expert but i find that the following works wonders:ġ) Get Enhanced or Upgraded Hulls on all of your ships. “This is a richly researched, well-argued, collaborative study of the naval organizational cultures of Britain and the U. “In this important and innovative book, Mullins shows how the dominant strategic ideas of naval officers and the organisational culture of the Royal Navy were central to the emergence of modern British sea power at the turn of the twentieth century.” (Professor Theo Farrell, Dean of Arts and Social Sciences, City, University of London, UK) Beyond its own chronological range, the book will also be of interest to those who write about naval competition before the Great War.” (Professor Matthew Seligmann, Professor of Naval History, Brunel University London, UK) ![]() The range of sources is impressive and the arguments advanced are supported at all times by relevant primary materials. “This is a carefully researched and well presented book. ![]() “Mullins not only provides a challenging reinterpretation of both American and British naval thought at a critical juncture, but his focus on organizational culture and political context is one that can fruitfully be followed in studies of contemporary policy-making.” (Sir Lawrence Freedman, Emeritus Professor of War Studies, King's College London, UK) It is a ‘must’ read for any student of British and American naval strategy in the pre-dreadnought era.” (Professor Holger H. It is cogently argued, measured in tone, exhaustive in research, and well written. Using an extensive archival research methodology, Mullins links the service culture of British and American navies to the policymaking process in general, and to the Naval Defence Act of 1889 and Secretary Tracy’s Annual Report to Congress of 1890 in particular. It is also essential reading for those interested in the naval arms race during this period. This study will be of interest not only to historians but to political scientists, sociologists, and others working in the fields of international relations, strategic studies, policy analysis, and military learning, adaptation and innovation. It pays particular attention to activities of the key individuals in both countries’ navies, who were instrumental in transforming their respective services’ organizational culture. In examining the development of strategic thinking in the Royal and US Navies, it overturns conventional wisdom regarding genesis of the Naval Defence Act and the US Navy’s about-face from a defensive to an offensive strategic orientation. This volume examines the transformation of British and US naval policy from 1870 to 1889, which resulted in the British Naval Defence Act (1889), the construction of the first modern US battleships, and began the naval arms race which culminated in World War One.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |